Meta has criticized the Australian government for hastily implementing a groundbreaking social media ban for users under the age of 16, claiming it disregards evidence and excludes the perspectives of young people. Despite these objections, Australian lawmakers backing the legislation argue it is crucial to shield future generations from the harmful content prevalent online.
The legislation, passed by the Australian parliament after a brief one-day inquiry and review of 15,000 submissions, is seen as a potential precedent for other nations considering similar measures. However, the bill has faced resistance from various quarters, including an independent MP who labeled it “a solution from the 1970s for a problem of 2024,” and from human rights organizations and mental health advocates warning of potential marginalization of youth.
Although most social media platforms have pledged compliance with the law, non-adherence could result in fines reaching $50 million. Tech companies, however, have voiced concerns about enforcement challenges and possible adverse outcomes.
“The process behind this legislation was rushed, ignoring critical evidence, existing age-appropriate measures, and the input of young people,” a Meta representative stated. “We hope for collaborative discussions on the bill’s implementation to ensure feasible solutions that don’t overly burden parents or teens, while ensuring uniformity across all social platforms.”
Elon Musk, owner of X, has openly criticized the legislation, calling it “a covert method to regulate internet access for all Australians.”
Murray Watt, an Australian cabinet minister, urged social media companies to take the law seriously, emphasizing the reputational and financial stakes involved. “Social pressure and steep fines will compel these companies to comply. If they don’t, we’ll take necessary actions,” Watt affirmed.
The opposition party in Australia has also supported the ban, with Shadow Communications Minister David Coleman highlighting its importance. “This generation faces unparalleled exposure to harmful content. We can’t ignore this reality; we need to confront it and act decisively,” he told Sky News.
Internationally, the ban has drawn attention. The UK’s Technology Secretary Peter Kyle expressed interest in observing the law’s rollout, emphasizing the need for decisions rooted in solid evidence. Similarly, French Education Minister Anne Genetet has shown support for adopting a similar approach, and Switzerland’s media reported significant public backing for such a measure.
Despite its intentions, the legislation has sparked criticism from various organizations. Australia’s Human Rights Commission warned the law might restrict young people’s rights and social participation. Christopher Stone, Executive Director of Suicide Prevention Australia, argued that the government rushed into the decision without fully considering the positive aspects of social media on youth mental health and connectivity.
Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young voiced her disapproval, describing the law as “boomers dictating internet rules to make themselves feel better.”
As debates continue, the Australian legislation stands as a bold, controversial step in addressing the challenges of the digital age and its impact on younger generations.
